04-07-2017, 11:42 AM
(04-07-2017, 11:40 AM)bfine32 Wrote: If you think this country doesn't do everything in its power to reduce collateral damage and demonstrates a "pattern of reckless disregard for civilian casualties" then we disagree.
It has been explained to you at least twice. We have let him do as he pleased until he showed the world that he didn't have to listen to a mandate not to use chemical weapons.
Just as I would hope if it is found that Iran is using their uranium to develop nuclear weapons we would intervene.
We decide it is a necessary loss based on our needs in the conflict we are in, Assad has done the same in his fight.
So when we were told in 1929 not to waterboard, why didn't we get hit with tomahawk missiles? We agreed not to do it and did it anyways.
