What would you do in Syria

[*bfine32*]

(04-07-2017, 11:42 AM)Au165 Wrote: We decide it is a necessary loss based on our needs in the conflict we are in, Assad has done the same in his fight.

So when we were told in 1929 not to waterboard, why didn't we get hit with tomahawk missiles? We agreed not to do it and did it anyways.

You can live life looking though the rear window or the front one; it's up to you.

You can compare a method of prisoner interrogation with unleashing chemical gas on civilians if you think it makes your point I suppose. The point is he used Chemical weapons on his citizens 4 years after he was told do what you want, but don't use chemical weapons.

What would you have us do? Say we were just bluffing 4 years ago?