What would you do in Syria

[Dill]

(04-09-2017, 02:32 AM)JustWinBaby Wrote: This is only a debate because Trump took action...as opposed to letting the liberal media excuse inaction.

It's not a debate because Trump first signaled he would leave Syria alone--likely triggering the chemical attack--then chose to ignore an existing option (to act through the UN) in favor of warning Assad of an attack not striking any chemical storage facility, leaving the runway operable?

The people praising this action--can any of them explain how it relates to articulated long-term policy goals?

If you can step outside media framing of this incident, I would like to hear your evaluation.