What would you do in Syria

[*bfine32*]

(04-09-2017, 12:58 PM)Dill Wrote: You have not answered my question regarding the attack's relation to our national interest. And now you contradict your own justification of "national interest" by acknowledging Assad's respect for US forces.  Apparently, you cannot "paint" Trump's action in a good light on its own merits, appealing rather to an imagined world census (which you will readily reject when it goes against Trump) plus your family.

Rather than answer the question, you shift discussion to your amusement, to your loneliness, and to "extremists," a label which includes those who continue to reason with logic and evidence without drifting into reports of how they feel.

A "lone conservative" should have some incentive to reject consensus as a criterion of truth.

I do not know how many times I have to answer the same question before you consider it answered: We have Troops on the ground in a country where its leader employed Chemical Weapons. Is it that I don't bold it?

Apparently, you, Syria, Russia, and Iran are those that "continue to reason with logic and evidence without drifting into reports of how they feel." There is no "imagined" consensus. The leaders of the western world are in unison with their support.