What would you do in Syria

[oncemoreuntothejimbreech]

(03-15-2017, 02:04 PM)bfine32 Wrote: As do I and the reasons are many. Just a couple:

First of all collateral damage and the problems it causes to ground forces who may have to move occupy after such a indiscriminate attack

It "cheapens' war. Anyone can strap an explosives devise on a $50 drone and crash it into innocent folks. They can then point to us as their example. 

It's nothing more than an aerial IED and that's how cowards engage in combat. 

What is a cruise missile, but a bottle rocket with a cellphone GPS anyone can strap explosives to and crash into innocent folks? It cheapens war. Especially for the Syrians when you don't hit the airstrip and flights resume within hours.

Except at $1.8 million each for 59 tomahawk missiles, we could have relocated all of the victims of the chemical attack, put $1 million each in their pockets, and stimulated our economy via the trickle down effect of voodoo economics.

First of all, consider all the collateral damage and the problems missiles cause to our ground forces in Syria who may have to move occupy after such an indiscriminate attack.

Secondly, a cruise missile is nothing more than an aerial IED and that's how cowards engage in combat.