04-13-2017, 08:22 PM
(04-13-2017, 08:10 PM)Dill Wrote: You are still puzzling me. Why would you assume the masking was not routine?
The national security adviser learns that two spies are discussing an exchange of information with an American whose name is "masked," but who appears to have become their asset. If those spies are connecting with people from the Trump organization during an election, then YES, that is something an NSC advisor needs to know. It would be dereliction of duty not to monitor this.
Why in the world would anyone jump to the conclusion IT'S ALL POLITCAL? Of course she is an Obama appointee. Every national security advisor is appointed by the sitting president.
Bels, Dino and Oncemore have all added individual points and information establishing that the unmasking was routine and motivated by clear red flags to national security, something NSC personnel may do several times a year, every year.
Now a bipartisan committee, having seen all the relevant unmasking documents, agrees there is no "there" there, while inside the bubble Gorka and Rush and Hannity continue to ratchet this up to WATERGATE level.
You don't pull the mask off the old Lone Ranger and you don't mess around with Win.
