04-22-2017, 05:29 PM
(04-22-2017, 04:38 PM)GMDino Wrote: So I can't hold them to a high moral standard just because they were "good" at what they do?You can hold them to whatever standard you want. But if you think that your standard is an actual metric of overall performance in their roles, you're being silly. You're probably an old man. You'd think that all those rockers you listened to before I was even born would've shown you that.
Interesting.
See *I* would say no one is perfect but there has to be a point where their actions have consequences. BOR is the latest example. Multiple women, multiple payoffs, etc.
Bill Clinton *should* have stepped down for lying to the American people.
Richard Nixon *did* step down.
Get the idea yet?
Although it sounds like you are firmly entrenched in the "family values" party.
Richard Nixon did some corrupt shit that directly impacted his ability to lead. It's not comparable to what's been discussed in this thread.
You think I'm "entrenched" with social conservatives? That's a first.
Most people have told me that I'm an edgelord piece of shit when it comes to all religion, including the religous right.
