EPA Scientific Advisory Board Shakeup

[*bfine32*]

(05-09-2017, 04:46 PM)Dill Wrote: Why do we need scientists, anyway?  Humans got by for thousands of years without them.
 

(05-09-2017, 06:13 PM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: First, they're talking about opening positions up to include industry scientists as well as academic scientists.

Second, who better to understand science than non-scientists?  Maybe that lady from Texas who steered the tornado with power of prayer and former governor of Texas and current Secretary of Energy Rick Perry who prayed for rain can lead the EPA?

Since prayer is such an effective cure for disease and trauma, maybe those two could lead the EPA in a prayer to pray the smoke away?  Speaking Perry and his rain dance, why hasn't he prayed for clean energy, yet?

If you ever wonder what caused the demise of this forum.....look no further that the provided examples.

No one said remove the scientists; I simply disagreed with a post that said remove private industry representation entirely and provided a short example of why all interests should be represented. To achieve the best solution for all parties.