06-06-2017, 11:53 PM
(06-06-2017, 10:37 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: The information released by this woman does not reveal this, at all.
If you broke the law and betrayed your terms of employment, absolutely. Especially if you did so for partisan reasons, which seems very probably in this case.
You'll forgive me, but you're regurgitating a lot of talking points here. I could be 100% against Trump's Russian ambassador meeting and still want this woman held accountable for her crimes. These are not mutually exclusive concepts. The fact that you equate them as such is honestly a bit disconcerting.
So you were privy to the classified information here detailing Russian hacking? Ok. Me and most of the rest of the country were not.
What is partisan in revealing a foreign enemy interfered in our election? This should be the most non partisan issue of all.
True. But information that would be readily available to the president about an enemy country interfering in our election did not stop the guy they helped get elected inviting them to the white house. Two seperate events. Like someone crossing the road is a seperate event than some guy driving his car. Just so happens guy got hit by that car.
