Comey's opening statement is out.

[GMDino]

(06-07-2017, 04:37 PM)michaelsean Wrote: He's not involved so you can't just claim he was trying to protect himself.  There is no Quid pro quo, demand,  nor any coercion here.  He is in fact in charge of the FBI, and has every right to comment on their investigations, and one as benign as this is no evidence of anything.

So the POTUS fires the head of the FBI.

His mouthpieces lie about why.  

Then a day later he admits his spokespersons were false.

He fired the head of the FBI because he was upset about the "Russian thing".

But since he wasn't under investigation (at least not when he was told he wasn't) you think there's no coercion? Even if he did it when the investigation wasn't over?

Even if in his small, muddled mind he was just trying to end it so he could "get something done" he still interfered in the investigation to help people in his administration.

Sidenote:  I almost wish this was Clinton doing it.  Just to watch y'all show how this proved how crooked she is.  I mean her husband met with the AG on a plane and the right wing echo chamber exploded with conspiracy theories.

Anything to protect your boy I guess.