Comey's opening statement is out.

[masterpanthera_t]

(06-08-2017, 05:56 PM)JustWinBaby Wrote: I don't think the law makes a distinction between intentional omissions or lies and honest mistakes, nor should it.  The only difference would be if criminal prosecution is warranted.

According to the NYT, these forms are often amended to address lapses.  The day after submitting, Kushner said supplemental material was to follow.  So maybe a non-issue (Flynn might be a different matter, though).

The point I was making with "proven to have lied" is if the clearing agency finds his statement to be a lie.  I.e. I don't know the issue to which Belsnickel was referring, and I don't know if Kushner lied or not, but if Belsnickel's statement is true, then Kushner's clearance should be revoked if already given, and future requests should be prejudiced in their consideration.