Comey's opening statement is out.

[Dill]

(06-09-2017, 12:01 PM)JustWinBaby Wrote: No, it's that you fail to acknowledge evidence where it was with respect to Clinton and Obama, and seeing evidence where we've seen none with respect to Trump.  Benghazi, Fast 'n Furious, IRS, AP, emails - if you weren't being partisan, you readily recognize the investigations and evidence that came from those.

And, yes, despite calls for special prosecutors in more than one of those scandals it was never allowed.

But don't worry, given time I'm sure Trump will have some real scandals of his own that produce tangible evidence where you can then be someone reacting to evidence rather than partisan hopes.

Calls for a special prosecutor don't always mean they are justified, or that mean Democrats just won't let nice Republicans do what's right.

Postpone your charges of partisanship until after providing some evidence and analysis yourself.

Start with Benghazi. After seven separate investigations, what "evidence" of what? 

State clearly what evidence people are seeing, with regard to Trump, that is not there.