A real scandal. Feinstein calls for L. Lynch investigation

[*michaelsean*]

(06-13-2017, 04:59 PM)Belsnickel Wrote: Stonewalling would have meant Congress didn't get the majority of the documents they requested, they wouldn't have gotten the responses they did from DoJ, etc. There was a lot of cooperation between the branches on this, but they don't share everything with each other. That goes both directions. It always has, and it always will, especially with a split government. With the level of cooperation Congress received I would absolutely not characterize what happened as stonewalling. We know what happened because of the work of Congress and the DOJ OIG. Had there been stonewalling we would not know a quarter of what we know.

Well Nixon gave them most of the tapes.  Executive privilege on a program you say you knew nothing about?

 Edit:It's just very hard for me to believe that the Justice Dept in part funded it, and Justice Dept officials are the ones that decided it should be gunwalking rather than arrest at the moment of exchange, and Holder knew nothing of it.