House Majority Whip shot at congressional baseball field

[Sociopathicsteelerfan]

(06-16-2017, 02:05 PM)Dill Wrote: The New York Times was not doing anything different from what you are doing in their the first version of the editorial--connecting dots between violent images used by Palin's campaign and the Giffords shooting. But when the connection could not be firmly established, they retracted the claim--unlike you.

http://www.businessinsider.com/new-york-times-corrects-column-gabby-giffords-2017-6

Absolutely incorrect.  The NYT editorial published information that had been disproven years ago.  Reiterating false information, that has been known to be false for years, is absolutely nothing like what you are trying to compare it to.  You want to give them credit for retracting a claim they knew to be false when they made it. 

False equivalency strikes again.