08-06-2015, 05:04 PM
(08-06-2015, 04:56 PM)GodHatesBengals Wrote: Not only is it an implicit defense, it is also factually incorrect. The biggest freeloaders in the country--corporations who receive government breaks, contracts, entitlements and bailouts--have been advertising Rand ever since they invented the Tea Party movement. Not to mention, Rand herself became something of a freeloader at the end, "begrudgingly" accepting Social Security.
No it's not an implicit defense. If I can say of course entrepreneurs don't like Marx, they believe in making their own way, is that an implicit defense of Marx?
The Tea Party was against all of the bailouts.
“History teaches that grave threats to liberty often come in times of urgency, when constitutional rights seem too extravagant to endure.”-Thurgood Marshall
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)
