Russia and our election

[*michaelsean*]

(07-06-2017, 04:03 PM)GMDino Wrote: DEA: I'm thinking it had to be just to get their opinion of the info that had been gathered to that point.

Geo-Spatial: Was that to figure the areas the data was coming from?

AF Intelligence: Same as above?

Marine Corp: From the link: " intercept and translate radio and electronic signals, analyze images collected from sensors and carry out counterintelligence."


Dept of Treasury: Again, from the link: "Today the Office of Intelligence and Analysis sits within the Office of Terrorism and Financial Intelligence, which works to prevent sanctioned countries, money launderers, terrorists, drug kingpins and purveyors of weapons of mass destruction from parking or moving their money through the U.S. financial system."



NRO: Again from the link: "The office designs, builds and operates the nation’s reconnaissance satellites, providing the Pentagon, CIA and others precision navigation, early warning of missile launches and near real-time imagery to support anti-terrorism activities."



So maybe it was a group effort.  Maybe it was to make sure what they had was what they had?  I'd say the more people involved without some giant disagreement just adds to the certainty.

I'm happy with the big 3 or 4 saying something.  I'm thinking several of those had little or nothing to do with it which is fine.  I'm not more impressed because the Coast Guard agrees.