07-11-2017, 01:21 PM
(07-11-2017, 01:16 PM)BmorePat87 Wrote: So Jr. tweeted out proof that he was told a "government lawyer" with "official documents" that could "incriminate Hillary" wanted to meet with him as "part of Russia and its government's support for Mr. Trump".
Don Jr's response: "I love it"
He then arranged for her to meet with him, the campaign manager, and his brother in law (acting advisor to candidate Trump).
Even if her story about not working with Russia or having information is true, Don Jr. and multiple campaign officials sought to work with the Russian government to win the election.
Is the intent to commit a crime enough to be guilty of a crime? In most cases, no, and so unless there is evidence that there was actually information being passed between them it is not a good case. Like I said earlier, based on what we know this is all circumstantial. There may be more to it, but that will be for Mueller to suss out.
"A great democracy has got to be progressive, or it will soon cease to be either great or a democracy..." - TR
"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - FDR
"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - FDR
