07-17-2017, 12:13 PM
Pretending as though this was the first time this woman was accused of disruption is what is being sold around here.
Instead of expensive legal action, would not a "three strikes and you're out" type of rule be more reasonable?...which would ban her from attending congressional hearings after the third offense.
Or will some liberal find a reason to cry about that too?
Instead of expensive legal action, would not a "three strikes and you're out" type of rule be more reasonable?...which would ban her from attending congressional hearings after the third offense.
Or will some liberal find a reason to cry about that too?