07-17-2017, 12:20 PM
(07-17-2017, 12:13 PM)Vlad Wrote: Pretending as though this was the first time this woman was accused of disruption is what is being sold around here.
Instead of expensive legal action, would not a "three strikes and you're out" type of rule be more reasonable?...which would ban her from attending congressional hearings after the third offense.
Or will some liberal find a reason to cry about that too?
I think the charges were an overreaction.
I don't know if there is a mechanism to keep citizens out of hearings? I'd agree that if someone is deliberately disruptive on multiple occasions that keeping them outside of the room would a good thing.
I disagree a that a derisive laugh is disruptive enough for that.
![[Image: giphy.gif]](https://media0.giphy.com/media/1kwsTjL8BNqlszNtnCE/giphy.gif)
Your anger and ego will always reveal your true self.