08-09-2015, 05:34 PM
(08-09-2015, 04:44 PM)GMDino Wrote: Yep. And there was enough doubt entered to get him off. Or are you for "overwhelming evidence" replacing the current system we have?
First of all I didn't us the term "overwhelming evidence" as some sort of legal standard of proof. There was no reasonable doubt in that case. The prosecution did a horrible job, this can't be denied. There were mistakes by by the LAPD, this can't be denied. Even with those of those factors the evidence was way past the reasonable doubt burden of proof. What this case was is a great example of how bullshit lawyer obfuscation can turn a trial into something other than its intended purpose.
