09-14-2017, 08:02 PM
(09-14-2017, 06:05 PM)PhilHos Wrote: Look, either provide proof that ISIS wanted terror attacks to be called Islamic terror attacks or admit you made that shit up. Your constant refusal to do so and your constant focus on a point I'm not contesting is rather tiring. Dare I say, Lucie-esque.
Not contesting?
(09-08-2017, 05:10 PM)PhilHos Wrote: That's all well and good, but none of that supports the claim that Islamic terrorists want to be called Islamic terrorists so as to encourage others to join their cause.
Seems like you are contesting it.
So I'm in the process of providing you with the proof you want after I've already provided you with other evidence you dismissed by helping you the understand why. So don't complain about the manner in which I provide you with what you asked for especially after I've already provided other evidence.
So why are the Islamic terrorists recruiting Islamic radicals? Is it because of their religion? Why is religion an important component for Islamic terror groups recruiting new members? How would calling them radical Islamic terrorists feed their rhetoric versus just labeling them terrorists when recruiting Islamic radicals to become radical Islamic terrorists? It's almost like there is some sort of unifying theme that brings these radicals together. Hmmm, maybe you can help me out; what's the common denominator? Is it Islam? Maybe even radical Islam? And how would Islamic radicals react to radical Islamic terrorist recruitment if they thought the West, specifically the US, was attacking their religion?
Starbucks put Happy Holidays on a coffee cup instead of Merry Christmas and Christians claimed they were under attack. Imagine how they would react if they were called "radical." Many shits would be lost.
