09-29-2017, 06:42 PM
(09-29-2017, 05:43 PM)Dill Wrote: Certainly I am aware that "the Hills" made private remarks about her husband's accusers. A wife defending her husband against charges that appear rather hard to substantiate. Why would Broaddrick deny Clinton had raped her and then change her testimony amidst a crowd anit-Clinton lawyers? All beside the point anyway since Bill Clinton has not running for office in 2016 and is not Michelle Obama's husband.
And I would certainly give Trump the same "benefit of the doubt." I have been doing it all along.
Michelle "simply" thought they should not vote for Trump because his disgusting, misogynistic behavior disqualified him for the office, assured he would do little to further women's issues. Why speak as if there were some other personal preference which motivated her, and not the disgusting behavior all have witnessed and all claim to deplore?
You are rolling here with a choice--1) attack Trump for his unapologetic denigration of women, or 2) attack Michelle for asking women voters to ask why they voted for a man like that. You've chosen the latter.
This thread has become an utter joke. I don't care what that she-male thinks.
Women want equal treatment to men? Thats perfectly fine. Trump is equally degrading and unpologetic toward women as he is toward men.
Because he called Rosie Odonnel a fat slob does in no way shape or form suggest he is "against women" or a mysoginist.
Women that voted for Trump agree with Trump no doubt.
End of story. Stop whining.
