Domestic Terrorism

[Dill]

(09-28-2017, 07:54 PM)Vlad Wrote: Superficially at worst.

His motivations had zero to do with white supremacy and everything to do with being anti government/ US military.

He sounded more like a white liberal than a white supremacist.

In fact he says the same shit thats been said on these boards.

Whether you wish to admit it or not, when you approve, morally, of the bombing of foreign targets by the U.S. military, you are approving of acts morally equivalent to the bombing in Oklahoma City ...

Can you agree Dino?....  that he takes the same positions as you Dill and others,  right?

Nothing "superficially racist" about imagining yourself in the world of The Turner Diaries.

You might be missing something here, Vlad. Liberals don't criticize the unnecessary bombing of civilians in Iraq and then bomb federal buildings/day cares in the US--cuz "it's the same."

Here is my favorite part of his confession/rationalization for killing all those children.

Hypocrisy when it comes to the death of children? In Oklahoma City, it was family convenience that explained the presence of a day-care center placed between street level and the law enforcement agencies which occupied the upper floors of the building. Yet, when discussion shifts to Iraq, any day-care center in a government building instantly becomes "a shield." Think about it.

LOL so the government put a day care in the Murrah building as a "shield."  And he was doing nothing different from what the US did when it bombed a country we were at war with.

There is nothing "liberal" about McVeigh's authoritarian world view, his determination to defend the Constitution from "enemies," whomever he determined these to be. Like an ISIS soldier swearing to destroy perceived Qu'ranic enemies, it was the only way he could hold together his fragmenting psyche.