10-01-2017, 07:58 AM
(10-01-2017, 01:43 AM)Dill Wrote: Well no, there are other options. I know a woman who was hurt because her husband had a drinking problem. She got him to go to rehab. He's been dry for over 20 years now. She neither removed him from her life nor "accepted the shame not being able to do anything about it."
I am not surprised if any wife hears a rumor about her husband with another woman and says something negative about the woman, in private, as Hillary did.
I don't understand why you don't grasp the inverse of your argument. Why would women want to be led by anyone who treats women abusively. Why is that a better choice than someone who already knows government, will fight for women's rights, and doesn't abuse women. Why does the abuser make sense in this choice?
in Hillarys case she would have blamed the booze manufacturers.
It's amazing why you refuse to consider her behavior as having nothing to do with preserving her and his career goals.
Well no, it's really not amazing.
