10-01-2017, 10:30 AM
(10-01-2017, 10:24 AM)StLucieBengal Wrote: Hiding behind nuance is pretty weak. Especially when nuance exists to everything. THe question was put forth about why women were "sexist" against hillary.... explaining her weak character is valid. Part of that weak character is allowing your husband to cheat for decades. That's fine for a kept woman who just lives a life. But she wanted to lead the free world.
Thankfully women saw through her bs and could easily see she was weak. And if his was the old south...... her father and brothers would have kicked Bill's tail decades ago. And since that never happened she looks weak.
Your opinion that her character was weak because of that is only that, your opinion. It is also not hiding behind nuance when there is nuance to the situation, which you admit.
And you definitely don't know The South.
