Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
A debate for mass shootings
#4
I'm going with not a terrorist. It way work in the same way as terror in that people stop attending functions like this, but terrorism stems from the intention of the person committing the act. so for example, the guy that attacked people with a machete at Ohio State could very well be a terrorist although nobody was killed.
“History teaches that grave threats to liberty often come in times of urgency, when constitutional rights seem too extravagant to endure.”-Thurgood Marshall

[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]





Messages In This Thread
A debate for mass shootings - Matt_Crimson - 10-03-2017, 10:58 PM
RE: A debate for mass shootings - Benton - 10-03-2017, 11:32 PM
RE: A debate for mass shootings - michaelsean - 10-04-2017, 09:18 AM
RE: A debate for mass shootings - Au165 - 10-04-2017, 12:10 PM
RE: A debate for mass shootings - GMDino - 10-04-2017, 12:14 PM
RE: A debate for mass shootings - GMDino - 10-04-2017, 04:37 PM
RE: A debate for mass shootings - GMDino - 10-04-2017, 04:30 PM
RE: A debate for mass shootings - GMDino - 10-04-2017, 04:48 PM
RE: A debate for mass shootings - GMDino - 10-04-2017, 04:54 PM
RE: A debate for mass shootings - GMDino - 10-04-2017, 05:03 PM
RE: A debate for mass shootings - GMDino - 10-06-2017, 11:12 AM
RE: A debate for mass shootings - GMDino - 10-06-2017, 01:17 PM
RE: A debate for mass shootings - GMDino - 10-06-2017, 01:28 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)