FBI invgestigation implicates Clinton’s and Obama Administration

[Dill]

(10-18-2017, 11:52 PM)SunsetBengal Wrote: You're right, this is huge.  The American public needs to know about it.  However, the biased mainstream media absolutely refuses to run stories that show the Democrat Party in any sort of negative light.  Even after this FBI confidential has come forward, they will continue to bury their collective heads in the sand, and pretend that it isn't real.

Sunset, I have often heard the "liberal bias" claim on Fox News, but I fear the liberal press did not get the memo regarding the Clintons.

http://www.curvemag.com/News/The-New-York-Times-versus-Hillary-Clinton-623/
https://www.good.is/articles/hillary-clinton-negative-press
https://www.good.is/articles/hillary-clinton-negative-press

It’s no secret that, from the moment she announced her candidacy back in April 2015, Hillary Clinton has been bludgeoned by negative media coverage. The email server; the Wall Street speaking fees; the attacks from both Trump and Sanders. I’ve debated with people who legitimately fear she will be imprisoned before the election. Some, despite the venomous dismissal of my rolling eyes, have called her a murderer. Others: an old woman, a plutocrat, a crook, abused by her husband, no backbone to speak of. But if you’ve suspected that there’s a reason people are saying these things—perhaps parroting disproportionately negative stories they’ve consumed in the media over the past year-and-a-half—it turns out you’re right.

A new report released this week by Harvard Kennedy School’s Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics, and Public Policy found Clinton has received far more negative coverage than any other candidate in the race thus far. The study was based on an analysis of news statements from CBS, Fox, the Los Angeles Times, NBC, the New York Times, USA Today, the Wall Street Journal, and the Washington Post.