10-30-2017, 01:43 PM
(10-30-2017, 01:23 PM)Belsnickel Wrote: If you are referring to that, then I have to disappoint you. The methodology used in the ODU findings, which this "independent think tank" used for their evidence was flawed. Extrapolating the numbers that they did from the data was just bad statistical analysis. On top of that, this is information about prior elections. His claim was that is happened during his election. Using that information is an attempt to move the goal posts, even if it wasn't deeply flawed.
I already knew about that one, at least. It made the rounds with political stat nerds a while back, and was widely disputed based upon flawed methodology to reach some of the conclusions. They neglected to account for response errors, and to adjust the margins based upon the small size of the sample of the population, especially when looking at non-citizen respondents. When you take those issues with methodology into account and combine it with actual data on non-citizen voting, you can tell that the calculation they came up with was laughable, to say the least.
I guess the countless reporting of illegals voting and registered to vote I. Numerous states is flawed as well lol
You guys make me laugh with your constant need to insist certain subjects or topics are untouchable.
