11-27-2017, 05:52 PM
(11-27-2017, 03:50 PM)Benton Wrote: They're not doing themselves any favors with the language here.
Trump's agenda from day 1 — all the chest pounding rhetoric about helping out American workers aside — has been pro-business. This move is pro-business. The logic behind it is about saving companies money; women's rights probably weren't factored into it at all.
So, no, Trump doesn't have an anti-women agenda. He's got a pro-big business agenda. She would've helped her cause if she would've been more upfront about that. Instead of saying it's a full frontal attack on women, just say he's a sleazy conman helping out his cronies, and women might get hurt in the process.
Can't be a little of both? I mean he's just pushing the "goold old boys" agenda while giving lip service (probably without even asking since he's a star, amiright?) to women.
(11-27-2017, 05:00 PM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: Huffpost article sourced/quoted, and zero original opinion input/opinion for the OP? That's when you just know it's going to be a quality thread.
And no opinion given in this response. So...thanks?
![[Image: giphy.gif]](https://media0.giphy.com/media/1kwsTjL8BNqlszNtnCE/giphy.gif)
Your anger and ego will always reveal your true self.
