11-30-2017, 05:35 PM
(11-30-2017, 05:19 PM)GMDino Wrote: It doesn't "allow" her to kill anyone. Never said it did. I said it should have been taken more into consideration when she was being sentenced.
If at any time I said she had the right to kill him (or anyone) with no repercussions please show me.
Yes, well, try re-reading what I said and this time don't stop when you see the word "and".
![ThumbsUp ThumbsUp](http://i.imgur.com/6u74Wyv.gif)
(11-30-2017, 05:19 PM)GMDino Wrote: And she was found guilty of that and punished. Too severely in my opinion.
Good for you. I don't agree. 50 years s overkill given her situation in my opinion. Thanks.
Right, because having a tragic past means you can kill whomever in cold blood and only have to spend a couple years in prison.
![Whatever Whatever](http://i.imgur.com/Wg4tGq6.gif)
![[Image: giphy.gif]](http://media1.giphy.com/media/9EmYYw6o9cmsM/giphy.gif)