08-24-2015, 02:48 AM
(08-22-2015, 09:50 PM)Johnny Cupcakes Wrote: So in your opinion, it's completely plausible for a being that existed before time to have decided to create everything that has ever been known, but it is not plausible to think that it might have all been an accident?
Both of those ideas are mind-blowing to me, and I won't pretend that I know how the universe, or even life on this planet began. I just always find it odd that so many people can say that the "accident" idea is so far out there, but feel that the "everything was created by an infinite omnipotent being" is a completely logical explanation.
Like with anything, an accident becomes less of an accident when more facts/answers are added. And i'm not saying ID is completely logical against the accident argument. I'm just saying, unlike a lot of people, when more answers are added and those answers point to A + B + C + D = E, accident becomes less likely and design becomes more likely.
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)
"The measure of a man's intelligence can be seen in the length of his argument."
