05-21-2015, 09:13 PM
(05-21-2015, 04:44 PM)BritishBengal Wrote: I've mentioned this a few times on the old boards, a uni only looks daft when the franchise it represents has a unsuccessful history. Had the Bengals been one of the dominant teams of the last few decades, winning superbowls, having HoF players, then the strips would represent winning and success.
There is a reason the Steelers and Packers are in the top 3 and the Jags and Bengals languish bottom.
If the Packers had the same history as the Bengals, that uni would look a whole lot more ridiculous.
Yeah, I'd imagine there's some validity to that. Percepcion probably means as much as actual appearance when you're discussing uniforms.
(05-21-2015, 04:09 PM)Johnny Cupcakes Wrote: Awesome lids....horrible uniforms.
But, there's also that. Give me the '97-'03 uniforms before we got that silly white piping.
“We're 2-7! What the **** difference does it make?!” - Bruce Coslet
