01-31-2018, 08:17 PM
(01-31-2018, 06:29 PM)Millhouse Wrote: I stand corrected by this. According to a Washington Post poll back in 2016, 9/10 Indians weren't offended by the word Redskins. And per article it says that has remained unchanged since 2004.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/new-poll-finds-9-in-10-native-americans-arent-offended-by-redskins-name/2016/05/18/3ea11cfa-161a-11e6-924d-838753295f9a_story.html?utm_term=.8413e226154e
This brings up an interesting dynamic: If a population doesn't consider a term used to describe them to be a slur, can it be a slur?
For instance was a survey taken of a population of Native Americans when Trump uttered Pocahontas or did it seem to upset more middle-aged white men?
![[Image: bfine-guns2.png]](https://i.ibb.co/YBkDQJV/bfine-guns2.png)
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)