03-19-2018, 03:42 PM
(03-19-2018, 03:00 PM)GMDino Wrote: Or, just spitballing here, or we could wait for the report, see what McCabe even did and why the firing was the only choice. And why it was 26 hours before his retirement.
You know, "wait and see" as they say.
Oh, I completely agree. I don't think any decision should be made on the validity of this firing until the evidence is on the table.
Quote:Welp, that's a wonderful opinion you have. I tried. Thanks.
This is an odd statement. On one hand you're saying that we should, "wait and see", which I completely agree with. Then you take issue with my saying if you've already decided that McCabe is innocent, which is in direct opposition to your "wait and see" viewpoint, then you are, by default, stating the investigation that found him "guilty" is corrupt. So which is it, should we wait and see or should we say McCabe is innocent? You can't logically have it both ways.
