03-19-2018, 04:22 PM
(03-19-2018, 04:07 PM)hollodero Wrote: That very phrase bugs me whenever I see it. There's really zero indication of "blatant abuse", and parroting that line is just playing for the right team by following the FOX et al. narrative. I actually read what Nunes had to say about the FISA abuse. In short, it's brööööh.
As for the topic at hand... I feel SSF is kinda right. One can't quite be certain of McCabe's innocence without blaming the internal FBI investigators of following Trump's orders. But what do I know, so I wish to be ignored on that one.
Unless I missed it, no poster on this thread has yet expressed certainty of McCAbe's innocence. Questioning the process, as two posters have, does not logically entail a claim for McCabe's innocence. E.g., he could have lacked "candor" AND the Justice Department, under pressure, could have expedited/engineered his firing for political purposes.
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)