05-11-2018, 10:44 AM
(05-11-2018, 10:38 AM)fredtoast Wrote: This makes no sense at all.
How does property ever give consent? The issue of consent is between two people. The law should be consistent. There is ZERO burden on a person to notify the other that consent is withdrawn.
The easiest way to create a "rape culture" is to allow consensual sex to be defined as "rape" if one party changes their mind.
Property crimes are different than crimes against a person, yes? Crimes against a person involve denying someone of life or liberty. To me it is a perfectly logical system that sets a higher standard for crimes against a person compared to property crimes. Theft of property can be compensated for, and while we like to place values on the lives of human beings in a number of ways, there is no adequate compensation for depriving someone of life or liberty.
As for the last line there, none of what I am saying does that.
"A great democracy has got to be progressive, or it will soon cease to be either great or a democracy..." - TR
"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - FDR
"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - FDR
