05-14-2018, 04:14 PM
(05-14-2018, 03:57 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: We can debate the usefulness of the previous deal, but I don't think it could be said that it would prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon. If they complied with every facet of the deal many of the conditions had a sunset clause. At best the deal was delaying Iran from developing a nuclear weapon. Odd, as they've publicly stated that they don't want them.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/iran-we-do-not-want-nuclear-weapons/2012/04/12/gIQAjMNnDT_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.576b1071b01a
Why the need for a deal with Iran about developing something they state they don't even want?
So we couldn't trust Iran under the deal...but we can trust what they say about not wanting nuclear weapons.
Classic!
![[Image: giphy.gif]](https://media0.giphy.com/media/1kwsTjL8BNqlszNtnCE/giphy.gif)
Your anger and ego will always reveal your true self.
