05-24-2018, 03:02 PM
(05-24-2018, 01:51 PM)Belsnickel Wrote: It is preventing an avenue of expression to the government. It is a government official restricting their freedom of expression. We may all agree in here that it is not something that we see as a major restriction, but the courts see it as enough to not be trivial.
So, in the courts opinion, a government official is REQUIRED to hear any and all expressions made to them? That's ludicrous. So, if someone comes running up to a senator, shouting how much said senator sucks, the senator is required to stand there and listen?
C'mon, Bels. You gotta see that this is a ridiculous ruling.
What Trump should do (and considering how petty he is, he just might) is follow this judge on twitter and lambast them all the time and if the judge tries to block him ...
![Smirk Smirk](http://i.imgur.com/dO89fQF.gif)
(05-24-2018, 02:14 PM)BmorePat87 Wrote: I know, I was referring to Hogan in MD.
Oh, my bad.
![[Image: giphy.gif]](http://media1.giphy.com/media/9EmYYw6o9cmsM/giphy.gif)