09-04-2015, 12:01 PM
(09-04-2015, 11:44 AM)GMDino Wrote: Because the government didn't pay the bribes or accept that the bribes were good.
One man did.
So IN THIS CASE the private company and the judge were corrupt. And the judge corrupted the system all by himself. The SYSTEM was not corrupt...what the judge did to it was. See?
Well then only the guy who gave him the bribe was corrupt. Not the company.
“History teaches that grave threats to liberty often come in times of urgency, when constitutional rights seem too extravagant to endure.”-Thurgood Marshall
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)
