Trump, Kim sign "comprehensive" document

[Millhouse]

(06-12-2018, 04:21 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: Let's put it this way.  One deal has denuclearization and doesn't address human rights.  It has an 85% chance of being accepted and implemented.

The other deal has denuclearization and addresses human rights. It has a 20% chance of being accepted and implemented.  Which do you go for?

The common sense answer should be the first option as denuclearizing NK is the top priority over all else. 

Sorry, but if it means them having nukes while committing human rights violations, or not having nukes while committing human rights violations, I'll take them just not having nukes. Sometimes we cant have all the cake and eat it too, or however that saying goes.