Trump admin to end separation policy

[*bfine32*]

(06-26-2018, 03:52 PM)Dill Wrote: Wow, sorry. THAT link used ONE example of someone who entered ILLEGALLY seeking asylum and was separated from his daughter and, like many others cruelly forced to choose between reuniting with her and giving up asylum.

Here is an example of a Congolese mother who did enter LEGALLY and found herself quickly separated from her daughter who, so far as I know, is still somewhere in limbo in our new child Gulag. WAPO has posted her asylum suit.
http://apps.washingtonpost.com/g/documents/national/asylum-lawsuit/2788/

But there are many others as well. Here are five more examples of parents who LEGALLY applied for asylum and were separated from their children. https://www.humanrightsfirst.org/blog/asylum-seeking-families-too-are-being-separated

So my cap lock is still ON  regarding the ILLEGALITY and CRUELTY of this separation policy.

My question was not simply about separating children from parents, which you may be okay with if parents arrive ILLEGALLY.

My question was about the practice of separating asylum seekers--LEGAL OR ILLEGAL--from their children, and then forcing them to choose between reuniting with their children and dropping their petition for asylum--or not reuniting.


"Leftist" organizations like Lutheran, Methodist, Ba'hai and Catholic churches, not to mention Ba'hai and Synagogues, are publicly protesting this traumatic abuse of children for political purposes.
https://www.ncronline.org/news/justice/bishops-across-us-condemn-separation-detention-migrant-children
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/acts-of-faith/wp/2018/06/19/from-pulpits-across-america-sermons-condemn-separation-of-immigrant-families/?utm_term=.35db1fbdc0ce

"Left leaning" now appears code for "ethical" behavior, in contrast to the rightist commentators/politicians, who  are never fooled by images of suffering children and speak of child actors coached to speak "liberal" to reporters. For them, its about biased "leftists" making Trump look bad for enforcing the rule of policy law and the parents are to blame. 

http://thehill.com/homenews/media/392774-ann-coulter-calls-immigrant-children-child-actors

Sessions says immigrant children are used to "smuggle drugs." No sympathy there.
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/immigrant-children-ms-13-smuggle-drugs-sessions/story?id=56146381

And of course, right wing news forums are busy with rightist posters echoing these claims about children "coached by commie traitors" who should all be sent back. http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/06/25/donald-trump-send-illegal-immigrant-children-back-to-their-home-countries/

Hell you were the one that posted that ONE EXAMPLE, not me. It doesn't take all that typing to say "Yeah, that may not have been a good example to plant my, what about the legality of this case" flag. YOU made YOURSELF look foolish.

But keep up the dissertations, link posting, and bold caps routine. It might impress some but most know it's just obfuscation. Who knows, I may take the time to click on your links and illustrate how you once again to make the point that was addressed, but I'm kinda into this WC game right now.