Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
There is no proof that Jesus existed
#19
(07-11-2018, 06:28 PM)Devils Advocate Wrote: too many political threads, not enough religious threads.

There is zero archeological evidence that Jesus existed.

Zero contemporary historians mention him. The ‘contemporary’ historians that do mention him came some years later. Josephus, Pliny, Tacitus & other’s that mention him (which is barely a mention) are considered fraudulent; that is to say, that it is accepted by today’s historians that where Jesus is mentioned in these writings, it was added some time later, sometimes centuries later, by someone else (not the original writer).

Jesus wasn’t even his name as Jesus is Roman(Latin?) for Joseph.

So yeah, countless Joseph’s probably lived throughout the ages, including the time of ‘Jesus’, but none as magical as the storied savior.

There have been some scholars over time question the validity of what Tacitus wrote, but overall most don't consider it fraudulent.
“Don't give up. Don't ever give up.” - Jimmy V

[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]





Messages In This Thread
RE: There is no proof that Jesus existed - Millhouse - 07-12-2018, 12:48 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 18 Guest(s)