There is no proof that Jesus existed

[*michaelsean*]

(07-12-2018, 12:52 PM)Nately120 Wrote: I may be thinking of something else, but I believe it is one of those things that is believed to be falsified because it portrays Jesus more as "what we've come to expect" and less of "what he probably actually looked like."  Basically, Jesus looks like a northern Italian guy from the late 1400's or so since Michelangelo's depictions of him have become the standard when it comes to what we look for as we seek evidence of Jesus.

Not unlike the  manner in which people see ghosts and aliens and what not that coincidentally look like how we expect ghosts and aliens to look due to their depictions on tv, etc.

I' pretty sure they carbon dated it to like the 14th century as well.  I always wanted them to do that, but then was a little sad.  The "what if" was pretty cool and now it's gone.