Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
There is no proof that Jesus existed
#39
(07-12-2018, 01:40 PM)Dill Wrote: I don't think they could be considered "historians."

When were their gospels written down? Dates?

I believe the earliest known copy of the gospels was a portion of a copy of Mark and it was dated to around 90 A.D. Only around 20 years after the gospel of Mark was supposedly written (70 A.D.).

Also, Luke would definitely be considered a historian since that was the whole purpose of his book. The others, not so mcuh.
[Image: giphy.gif]





Messages In This Thread
RE: There is no proof that Jesus existed - PhilHos - 07-12-2018, 03:23 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)