What will last of Trump?

[*michaelsean*]

(07-19-2018, 11:15 AM)Dill Wrote: Sorry about the confusion.  My point, in part, was that today's hyper partisanship affects the way things are supposed to work in theory.

Zero no votes for Kagan and Sotomayor from Dems?

Zero votes at all for Merrick Garland--yes or no, Republican or Democrat.

Further, I am concerned that the Federalist Society has been so openly involved in creating Trump's list of nominees. We have a president who knows nothing of this process being "guided" by a narrow, special interest.  We need more than checks in theory.

I agree 100% on Garland, and would be perfectly fine with the Dems replying in kind if they take the Senate.  From what I understand they have a shot at holding this up through the seating of a new Senate.  

I haven't paid a whole lot of attention, but are there specific things that would make you think Kavanaugh is not qualified?  I imagine there are plenty of things you would disagree with, but that's a different discussion. Let's remember that NOW said Souter would end women's rights, the NAACP started a letter writing campaign against him, and Kennedy and Kerry voted against him, likening him to Bork.