09-06-2015, 11:22 PM
(09-06-2015, 10:47 PM)jakefromstatefarm Wrote: That means that there's a difference between me VOLUNTARILY donating my money and time to charity and being FORCED to do it through government mandate, thanks to people like you that think it's compassionate to rob someone else of their money and give it to others.
Maybe if I explain this to you another hundred more times you'll finally grasp the concept.
It's not compassion if it's done by force. It's compassion if it's done voluntarily.
If you voluntarily donated money to charity then you would have NEVER said that you had no responsibility to help the poor and that no one but your own family was entitled to the money you earned.
If you really were as compassionate as you are suddenly trying to claim then you would have said that you give money voluntarily instead of saying that no one is entitled to the money you earn other than your own family.
