08-15-2018, 02:48 PM
(08-15-2018, 02:40 PM)fredtoast Wrote: I still don't see your point. Why don't you make a statement and tell us what you mean instead of just asking questions on all sorts of tangents.I've made lots of statements.I know you don't see my point because you are trying to twist something. Nobody (except maybe Dill) thinks an employee not getting a share of profits is a loss to them unless they were promised a share of the profit which some companies do. Earnings go to owners. That's the point of being an owner. That's how they make their money. If they want to share it by giving raises or having an employee profit plan, that's great.
Please tell me what you think of this statement. . . . If workers are more productive and produce more wealth should they get a share of it or should the owners take it all?
And I see you slipped more productive in there.
And remember if you share the profit, you share the loss which means you don't get laid off, you work for free.
“History teaches that grave threats to liberty often come in times of urgency, when constitutional rights seem too extravagant to endure.”-Thurgood Marshall
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)