Good Night Irene

[BmorePat87]

(08-17-2018, 04:16 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Nope, it was to refute the fact that you point to the act simply because you cannot dispute the cause. Sorry about failing horrendously; keep focusing on the trees.

So I am compelled to accept a nonsensical argument from you and am not allowed to dismiss it? This reminds me of a week ago when you said that we had to accept Trump's argument that you have to show your ID when you go to the grocery store in his attempts to defend a nonsensical argument.

You're saying I am focusing on the trees and not the forest, but your trees are palm trees, far away from the forest.