CNN refuses to retract its lie

[fredtoast]

(08-30-2018, 08:18 PM)6andcounting Wrote: To not knowingly quote a source while denying they knowingly quoted the source.

I am guessing that happens all the timein order to protect anonymous sources.

But what difference does it make now that Davis has admitted he was oneof the sources and CNN has put him on the air to give his new version of the truth.

I could see it being a problem if they refuse to acknowledge that Davis has changed his story, but they did not do that.  Instead they allowed him to broadcast his new story.


Explain to me how exactly it has been proven that davis was lying before instead of lying now?  Unless you can provide that then CNN is under no obligation to retract their story.  They claim they have other sources.