08-31-2018, 07:59 PM
(08-31-2018, 07:18 PM)bfine32 Wrote: That they paid a foreign agent to spy on a political opponent. But as I said; it's just an opinion.
What happened was very common. It's why the Washington free Beacon paid the same firm to do the same thing prior to the Clinton campaign. This is a commonplace practice in campaigns both primary and general. It's unseemly, but I can guarantee you that the same thing was being done by Trump's campaign. The only difference is that Trump's life has not been one of public service and hasn't faced the public scrutiny over the years as Clinton.
(08-31-2018, 07:21 PM)SunsetBengal Wrote: You keep acting like anything in the dossier was factual, when even the composer won't swear by it.
Do you know what all was in the dossier? A lot of it has been corroborated. Everyone just focuses on some of the more explosive claims, but a good chunk has been validated and is agreed with by our intelligence community. There were things in there that were suspicions Steele had which I don't expect him to swear to, but those aren't things anyone is claiming are certain (though a lot of people on the left hope they are).
"A great democracy has got to be progressive, or it will soon cease to be either great or a democracy..." - TR
"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - FDR
"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - FDR
